The Landscape Photographer

I aim to post stories behind my photos here as well as descriptions of any locations I visit from time to time... Anybody know how to get rid of the lime green?

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

My mini investigation into archival paper

It seems as though there is conflicting advice on paper on the web - isn't there always conflicting advice on the web? Afterall you can find any combination of problems and solutions to fit your scenario! However, if you take a look at Wilhelm Research they state the following;

See the PDF here >>

On an Epson 2100 / 2200 with Epson Inks

For displayed prints (UNFRAMED)
Years before noticeable fading or colour change is observed
  • Epson Enhanced/Archival Matt Paper : 41 years
  • Textured fine art paper was the best Epson Paper: 68 years
  • Epson Velvet fine Art was the worst Paper: 34 years
Behind glass they all did better than 60 years and behind UV glass better than 100 years

Therefore I am going to stick with my Archival Matt as it does very well.


Calm, Hornsea Beach, England

2 Comments:

At 9:53 PM, Blogger Rylee Isitt said...

Print longevity is not only specific to paper, but to ink as well. There are both dyes and pigments, and the permanence ratings are very different. This paper seems to allude to the fact that it's rating dye inks, which are no longer used in the new Ultrachrome inks.

2002 was a "long time" ago in terms of technology. With modern ink and printers I would expect these numbers to be even higher.

Have a look here:
http://www.epson.ca/cgi-bin/ceStore/Landing/GenuineInk.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes#Life

This pdf is also from wilhelm (see link at the bottom of the pdf) so the numbers should be just as trustworthy. For clarity's sake these numbers are all for framed prints.

I had no idea that Velvet fine art trailed many of Epson's other papers. It's advertized as being acid free, archival, etc etc. It's a confusing world! Still, you can't complain about 61 years I guess.

I will consider switching to heavyweight matte paper. 150 years is exceptional. While no number is provided for the Stylus Photo 2200 my guess is it would be just a bit lower.

 
At 3:31 AM, Blogger barb michelen said...

Hello I just entered before I have to leave to the airport, it's been very nice to meet you, if you want here is the site I told you about where I type some stuff and make good money (I work from home): here it is

 

Post a Comment

<< Home